PHYSIOGNOMY

Learn more

Policies

The program is guided by a set of innovative policies designed to ensure its educational integrity, contextual relevance, and effective coordination. These policies underpin the program’s success and sustainability, fostering a supportive and dynamic environment for both teachers and students. This section details some of the key policies that drive the program’s unique approach.

No-Advertisement Policy

The no-advertisement policy is crucial for maintaining the educational focus and integrity of the program. This policy ensures that the program remains free from unnecessary publicity that may not be beneficial, particularly from public social media uploads. By avoiding widespread social media exposure, the program protects the educational process from external distractions and commercial influences.

Key Features:

  • Educational Integrity: By eliminating unnecessary publicity, the program prioritizes educational content over commercial interests, ensuring that the focus remains on learning and intellectual development.
  • Privacy and Focus: The absence of public social media uploads creates a distraction-free learning environment, protecting students’ privacy and allowing them to engage more deeply in educational activities without external pressures.
  • Community-Centric Approach: This policy encourages a focus on local communities and internal program evaluation rather than seeking external validation through social media. It helps maintain a close-knit educational community where the emphasis is on meaningful interactions and learning experiences.

Neutrality of Discussion

The neutrality of discussion policy empowers teachers to create their own curricula, materials, and debate designs independently, tailored to their distinct contexts and directions. This policy ensures that educational content is relevant and respectful of diverse viewpoints, fostering a balanced and inclusive learning environment.

Key Features:

  • Context-Specific Materials: Teachers develop materials specifically for their local contexts, ensuring that they address the unique cultural, social, and economic factors relevant to their students.
  • Limited Distribution: Materials are produced in limited copies for local use only, not for public sale or wide distribution. Publications are often created by local studios or art centers, maintaining the focus on localized education rather than commercial publication.
  • Freedom: Teachers are encouraged to explore diverse perspectives and encourage open discussions, free from external biases or agendas. This approach fosters critical thinking and respectful dialogue among students.

Coordination Policy

The coordination policy promotes the formation of small, independent groups of teachers who work as networks within their regions. This decentralized approach enhances the program’s impact by ensuring that local needs and conditions are effectively addressed.

Key Features:

  • Independent Networks: Small groups of teachers coordinate locally, allowing for greater flexibility and responsiveness to regional educational needs and challenges.
  • Collaborative Development: These networks facilitate the sharing of best practices and resources among teachers, fostering a collaborative approach to curriculum development and implementation.
  • Enhanced Impact: By working independently yet in coordination, these teacher networks ensure that the program’s impact is maximized across different regions, adapting to local contexts while maintaining overall program goals.

Examples of Policies in Action

No-Advertisement Policy

In a school in Lisbon, Portugal, the implementation of the no-advertisement policy allowed the creation of a learning environment free from unnecessary publicity. Teachers reported that students were more focused and engaged in their studies without the distraction of social media exposure. This protected the educational integrity and privacy of the students.

Neutrality of Discussion and Coordination Policy

In Nigeria, a network of teachers developed a curriculum focusing on local cultural practices and history. The materials were produced by local artists, ensuring that the content was specific to the community and not influenced by broader commercial interests. This approach allowed for rich, contextual discussions and debates, enhancing students’ understanding and engagement.

In Kenya, a network of teachers collaborated to develop region-specific educational projects. This included the creation of an environmental education curriculum that integrated field trips and community involvement. By coordinating their efforts, these teachers were able to produce high-quality, contextually relevant educational materials that significantly enhanced the learning experience for their students.

Conclusion

The policies of the program play a crucial role in its success, ensuring educational integrity, contextual relevance, ethics, and effective coordination. By adhering to the no-advertisement policy, maintaining neutrality in discussions, and fostering independent teacher networks, the program creates a dynamic and supportive environment for both teachers and students. These innovative policies not only enhance the quality of education but also ensure that it remains relevant and impactful across diverse contexts.

PHYSIOGNOMY AT SCHOOL

 © 2019-2025 Physiognomy at School. All rights reserved.